In response of this reductionism “Deaf Anthology” and his well-known bashing on TheHolism as a personal instead of political observation.
In your statement, this author Jan Smuts spoken in the volume of one side of the story who considered himself a reductionism. In other word, he is no different from Darwin who believed strongly about evolution differ from Bible. These are type of people are trying to differ from any sources to make the money from the books they wrote. Therefore your attention on Theholism in your blogs is the other reason for you to gain the popularity.
Let me rephrase here, Holism means “The theory that whole entities, as fundamental components of reality, have an existence other than as the mere sum of their parts.” In plain English, It means to view and analysis this matter as whole not parts to enhance this balance. It has nothing to do with cult or new age movement. Spoken of Vatican, They are known for conceal the truths.
It is shameful for someone who decided to label this title based on reductionism. Do research on holism and understand this word as wholeness before you wrote in Deafread. If you do not therefore you share only a part of your perspective instead of wholeness. In another word, “Narrow mind person”
In additional, we are to be taught to observe this community as whole to help noticeably the problems and resolve from there. Deafhood is known for reductionism because they do not view this as whole but focusing on deafhood itself to achieve the rights on their own. What about our rights? If they understand holism therefore we would merge ourselves on a right path.
